Cyril

Document repository of… breadcrumbs?

Deets & Strats

Method

Configuration

2026/06

Overall, spinning up a new linux system has gotten remarkably easier over the years, to the point where a significant amount of the how-to/configuration documentation that I have captured is no longer needed.
Much of the archived info is only retained because I still own hardware that could possibly benefit from the legacy methods.
The increased ease is a direct result of two main things:

My preferences & usage patterns are well established

I have been daily-driving linux since 2016, and am well settled on the kind of interface and experience that I prefer, so now spend my computing time actually using the PC and not distro-hopping, tweaking & re-configuring, babysitting updates or troubleshooting upgrades.

‘Declaritive configuration’ for the win

From whatever distro/spin (immutable is a must these days), I add whatever apps/services that are needed via quadlets, flatpaks, and/or distrobox.
There is definitely a learning curve to gettting the non-native/containerized methods to play-well with the OS, but once established, the declaritive configuration approach is infinitely repeatable and eliminates fiddling with distro-specific patterns or package-groups.

Notes/Timeline

Spin/Pattern/Distro Base/DE Benefits Drawbacks
U-Blue/Dakota!! :) 2026/06 (testdriving) GnomeOS/Gnome immutable,rollback,rolling,auto-update,current Container-life, for better and for worse
U-Blue/Bazzite/Bluefin 2026/06 (current,serverus) Fedora-Silverblue/Gnome immutable,rollback,rolling,auto-update,current Container-life, for better and for worse
MicroOS/Aeon 2024/07 (current,laptop) tumbleweed/Gnome immutable,snapper,rolling,auto-update,current Container-life uncomplicates the base installation at the cost of complicating app installation/operation
tumbleweed 2019/02 Gnome zypper,yast,snapper,rolling,Nvidia repo,current yast/SUSE approach inherently introduces: 1) SUSE’s own way of doing things 2) a duplication of existing DE tools 3) less DE intregration
Fedora 2016/11 Gnome dnf,DE-transparent,Nvidia repo,current short support life, but not rolling. Consistent trouble upgrading versions
Manjaro 2016/08 Arch Out-of-the-box brilliance, insane package/DE availability, DE-transparent, Nvidia easiest, current feels a little unbridled for me. I like the (perceived) protections of the enterprise-backed distros.
Gnome   beautiful, minimalist approach, centralized settings, gtk4/csd resource hog (functions, but not as graphically snappy on older hardware)
elementary 2016/09 Ubuntu/Pantheon beautiful, minimalist approach, centralized settings, gtk4/csd OS: Ubuntu-based DE: settings/options are too limited, forcing command-line hackery for petty customization
Mint 2016/03 Debian Well supported, batteries included Ubuntu-based
xfce   light on resources, graphically snappy, runs csd apps not as cohesive as gnome
budgie   GNOME-like but snappier, more cohesive than XFCE less cohesive than GNOME, less snappy than XFCE, less mature/complete than both
cinnamon   familiar, centralized settings feels dated, anti-csd
Ubuntu 2014/09 Debian/Unity Baseline. Good enough, batteries included. VERY well supported b/c gateway distro Ubuntu uses a different filesystem-framework than other gnu/linux standards. I Never truly settled into the unity way-of-things.

Archive

Method/Config Reason Archived
docker/docker-compose I prefer the more native feel of Quadlets
Kodi Flatpak is good-enough, no longer need to build from source
nvidia Switched to linux-friendly Radeon where discrete card is used
Open CASCADE JT Assistant IDEK (haven’t used in a while)
Transmission (server) Configured via Quadlet
Transmission (docker) Configured via Quadlet
Tvheadend (docker) Configured via Quadlet
OS/DE Reason Archived
microOS Obsoleted by immutable workflow
Fedora Obsoleted by immutable workflow
OpenSUSE Obsoleted by immutable workflow
PantheNOT Un-used, not worth the trouble

Bookmarks

markdown extension for browser (best markdown find to date!)